So the young John is a lot more 'annoying' but he isn't always like that as he gets much older. A total 10/10. He left them because he didn't want to drag them into the outlaw life life or see them hurt because of him. Arthur saves Johns life multiple times throughout the story. I'd like to revisit it too when I've hand a chance to complete it, Arthur because of that accent and he looks like a great value Brian Cranston. So that is fact, Arthur didn't need to give his life because John would have survived regardless. I always hate how much John just insults and threatens to kill everyone who doesn't do exactly as he says. =))))). Arthur was definitely the work horse in RDR2 game, that's for sure. Don't compare him to Arthur because Arthur was 36 so he has 10 years more experience and is more wise. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. However, I’ve just finished the main story of RDR2 (not the epilogue just yet) and I have to say that Rockstar has taken it to another level with Arthur Morgan. Then when I got to the epilogue I was kinda pissed. Idk, I like arthur but my favorite thing about him is that beneath his gruff exterior he's got a wicked sense of humor. In retrospect Johns story may be sadder, but right up until the ending he had hope, Arthurs hope was gone fairly early in the story, especially if you were paying attention. That doesn’t mean I don’t like John — I do like him, I just like Arthur more. Always antagonizing or ignoring his son and baby mama. I know this is a bit of an old post, but I felt like replying anyway. They wanted to elicit change in the people of the West, although this might just be his own justification f… Arthur was just an outlaw who was doing Dutch's bidding for the most part. Admittedly, I saw Arthur as a kind of dull, errand-boy sort of character in the majority of the first two chapters, but in Chapters 4-6 specifically his character development is absolutely phenomenal. I don't have any reasoning for it, really, I just like John better. John went through tremendous change throughout the story and I really liked seeing his progress. Don't compare him to Arthur because Arthur was 36 so he has 10 years more experience and is more wise. I get that Arthur had to die because you couldn’t really survive tuberculosis at that time but he was a great character! You shouldn’t have to force a second play just to walk the open world with the main character. As Arthur begins to help John out of his snowy predicament, John says this quote in a manner of classic Marston sarcasm. The last but, hopefully, not least, is Arthur Morgan, another Dutch's best protégé. He'll take a kid fishing and then rob a train. Yes and more angry I didn’t create a second save file in Ch. Whereas, we see John with Abigail and Jack in camp so clearly he was the better family man. Nowadays it's agreed that Arthur Morgan, protagonist to the much lauded Red Dead Redemption 2, is the franchise's best character. Arthur Morgan or John Marston, who you got? save hide report. Despite the legendary status of the former two, however, Arthur Morgan is actually the best gunslinger. On par with John Marston, although Dutch van der Linde considers Arthur to be the better outlaw, and most of the camp has stated Arthur to possess better fighting experience. John was terrible in the game up until the end and the epilogue. John is a good example because if rdr2 was the first game they played they probably don't like the idea of play as john but we soon see what he is capable of when (SPOLIER IDK IF I HAVE TO PUT THIS CUZ ITS BEEN 5 OR 4 MONTHS)when je goes up the the mountains to fight Micah the person the killed arthur and we see that John is someone that was potential but we dont get see to much to his character because he didn't get that much of a story thats where rdr1 comes in and we the cowboy do amazing and fucking badass shit and I imma say but I think the only thing that john is better than Arthur is that he's more badass now I'm not gonna say Arthur morgan didnt do shit solo but John had memorable moments that I think are amazing and builds up to his character. An outlaw, former gang member and gunslinger. John Marston will always be the original mate and nothing will ever change that. I’m on my second play through now. The game ends with Arthur dying before helping John escape from the law, and the epilogue establishes the Marston family's post-outlaw life before teasing the events that lead up to the next (aka the previous) game. He can be serious, but also humorous at seemingly inappropriate times. Discussion. Arthur was a bad guy, no double about it, but so is John. Fandom Apps Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. He also chose to die for something rather than nothing. Capable of trading blows with those who can harm him and those with comparable durability, like Micah. He's a gang enforcer who named his last horse after an ancient Celtic Queen. Arthur Morgan or John Marston, who you got? Sure at first he was a drunk ass hole, but as the game furthers into the story, he starts to care for Jack, starts respecting Abigale, he begins to question Dutch. It’s pretty annoying. But that game serves as a prequel to Marston's Red Dead. I also get the feeling that he isn't really "redeeming" himself so much as he just feels like it's what he's supposed to do. ".This was the same reaction I got when john died and we got to play as jack but we didn't really hate jack because he was stupid and dumb which he wasn't...sort of but the reason why was because we lost a beloved character that we grew attracted to kinda like when a kid's mom dies and we see a beautiful nice lady his dad meets and that's his step mother,he doesn't hate her but she can't replace his mom but rather be different and special to him in her way and that's what we see in john and jack we see a new character that we should all give a chance and treat and not to look down on them. Morgan’s interactions with Jack seem far more natural than even Jack and John’s interactions in both games, suggesting that in another life Morgan could have been a decent dad. Firstly, they both have their Dead Eye ability, a double-barreled shotgun, one revolver, and a repeater. So yeah, he definitely gave a damn about them. JohnnyKanaka. With that said, if you spend some time reading Arthurs journal you'll actually notice the transformation had started at the very beginning of the game rather than in the last few chapters as you suggest. And also there is a second ending where Arthur goes back for the money and fights with Micah (and dies by gunshot or TB) but John still survives here. If I wanted to play as John I’d play the first red dead. I'm going to be completing all the collectables, hunting and free roaming on that. I loved every minute of playing as him. Despite the legendary status of the former two, however, Arthur Morgan is actually the best gunslinger. 0 2 20. comments. He's guilty of a lot of the same sins as John, but to a lesser extent? Oct 24, 2019 - Explore Kalley Carter's board "Arthur Morgan Outfit Ideas" on Pinterest. I like Arthur because he embodies the serious cowboy of the old west for me. I prefer Arthur in the game but John is pretty goofy in this game but red dead John I don’t think I could decide. حبينا الجزئين واتعلقنا بالشخصيتين! He even references shakespeare a couple times. You wrote this like everything you said is a fact? Though it was cool to see how he got Beacher’s Hope and how you build it with Charles and Uncle. There are three gunslingers who best define the Red Dead franchise: Red Harlow, John Marston, and Arthur Morgan. John Marston vs Arthur Morgan. He has a ton of character development in there. Totally fair, and I can relate to this reasoning. Ye, I have 3 saves, 1 as John, I when Arthur is sick, and 1 when hes healthy lol. Honestly very hard choice. It may seem counter-intuitive to suggest that Micah and John Marston are both the same level of evil, especially since John is the main protagonist in the first Red Dead Redemption. I think Arthur Morgan is better. In epilogue every time when I played with John i was thinking that Rockstar Games could do an epilogue in which Arthur was alive. Red Dead Redemption 2 isn’t short on its funny moments, and fans of the game over on Reddit are thoroughly enjoying a comparison of Arthur Morgan and John Marston’s journals. As far as sacrifice goes... Sure he was dying, But he would have lived a hell of a lot longer if he stopped trying to help and just settled back for a bit. Same here that shit sucks love the game wish it had different ending . However if we're talking purely about the ending then assuming you choose to help John, there is just no way for them to know that Arthur didn't save his life in the process. Which do you think is the better protagonist, and why? Arthur would only visit them once in a few months only so clearly he didn't give a damn about them. John Marston was born in 1873. Possibly an unpopular opinion, but I prefer Arthur. To anyone saying that Arthur's story is more sad than John's. SPOILERS Arthur Morgan vs John Marston,who is a better protagonist? Follow @RedDeadNet! I don’t think he’s a terrible character. This thread is archived. Yeah the subs here spoiled it for me already, but i litteraly just found out Arthur has the illnes and it got me sad a f, i wanted to complete everything with Arthur, loved John in RDR1 but in this one he irritated me, i really like Arthur now. best. I’m pretty bothered by the ending of RDR2. No throwables or explosives. There are three gunslingers who best define the Red Dead franchise: Red Harlow, John Marston, and Arthur Morgan. He was never devoid of any development through the game. Doesn't feel the same playing with John so once I killed micah I went back restarted from beginning not going past chapter 4 so I can run around free world as Arthur. 5 5. Subscribe: I did not expect this to happen at all but once again Rockstar has blown me away. Arthur Morgan (RDR2) vs. John Marston (RDR) Two of Rockstar’s Wild West best take each other on head-to-head in a feud for the century. This is all just opinions so John Marston fans, don’t burn me at the stake. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. A subreddit for Rockstar's critically acclaimed open-world Western game Red Dead Redemption, its prequel Red Dead Redemption 2, and its online multiplayer Red Dead Online. So I think we can all say think about something and that something is we should people chances and see how there trying to cheer you up or fill the hole of yours that's been drilled by a loved one. To everyone saying that John was annoying in RDR2: John was about 26 years old in RDR2 whereas he was almost 40 in the original. Along with John and Miss Grimshaw, he was one of the gang's first original members. Followers 1. Like when Dutch and his men comes to kill him and that professor, and he tells the professor he's gonna send him outside so they can tear him apart, then says he's just kidding lol. See more ideas about red dead redemption ii, red redemption 2, red dead redemption. It's a pretty tough call. 7 comments. If you didn't know Arthur had a son called Isaac. I never see any real remorse for what he's done in the past. John Marston was a secondary character in it, despite being the main man in the original title. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I think you missed a part of the story there, it's pretty clear he cared deeply about his son and gave money to them often. Does anyone else feel the same? Discussion. He didn’t seem believable to be a real cowboy. Arthur as I said, is just an outlaw who just blindly followed Dutch who suddenly changed after being diagnosed with TB. Awesome, good comment. John was a great character, my problem with him was that he seemed like too much of a movie character. John's father was blinded in both eyes during a bar fight south of Chicago at some stage, and loved to talk about Scotland and how he hated the English for what they did to his great-grandparents, although he never met them.In 1881, John's father passed away… 4. to go back to. Then eventually clone that save and keep 1 to carry on playing as Arthur and the other progress into the epilogue to get a 100% completion save. But yeah I didn't like it at first but by the end of the epilogue I loved john just as much. So Arthur was lucky that he got TB because it saved him. To anyone saying that Arthur saved John's life... Nope. I have a 77% story save with Arthur, just before the final few missions of Chapter 6. Fans say that, over the course of nearly two years of patches, Rockstar has slowly but steadily started to change what John Marston looks like in … Time and time again, members of Dutch’s gang will comment on … He’s a great character. I felt exactly the same, but not because I didn't like johns character. The series gave fans two empathetic and fleshed-out heroes in John Marston and Arthur Morgan, with the former also being a playable character in the epilogue of RDR2. help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts … I haven't finished the game yet, so I may be proven wrong later, but it rubs me the wrong way. I don’t want to spoil too much as I know a lot of people are yet to finish the game, but I think that Arthur Morgan (by the end of RDR2) now tops Marston as my favourite video game character of all time. In just bothered that I now have to play as John. He is fantastically written as a natural, rational and down to earth individual with somewhat of a sarcastic attitude to provide a means of humour. The original Red Dead Redemption recently celebrated its 10 year anniversary and thanks to the success of its sequel, Red Dead Redemption 2, the Western franchise remains as popular as ever. I agree. You make some good points, but I think there are a few things that should be pointed out. Source: Reddit, via Game Rant Press J to jump to the feed. Il go with John for old times sake but if when I finish the game I could change my mind. Time and time again, members of Dutch’s gang will comment on how good of a shot Arthur is. By Liberty-TG, March 25, 2019 in Red Dead Redemption 2. Fair, it's honestly a very touch call either way. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Your opinion is very good and I think same because you play a lot of missions with Arthur... and then they just give you John. Arthur was a much more realistic and believable character in my opinion. share. Micah Bell may be the villain of Red Dead Redemption 2, but judging from John Marston's actions in both the original Red Dead Redemption and its sequel, it appears John may not be much better than him.. Yeah after the ending the game just felt too different. He's more interesting than John, I reckon. Using Reddit. 9 “Rip Van Winkle” I like Arthur because he embodies the serious cowboy of the old west for me. Gladly i made 4 other savegames so i’ll be going back a few chapters i guess to collect everything and enjoy Arthur as much as i can. His redemption arc in RDR1 was one of the most well written stories in video game history. According to Marston, the gang stole and fought for a reason. John Marston the main protagonist of Red Dead Redemption. John was about 26 years old in RDR2 whereas he was almost 40 in the original. BIG SPOILER in this post so don’t continue unless you’ve beaten the game. A series of wolf attacks are the cause and finally, the origin of John’s scars are revealed. Sure, he'll survive if you go for the money, but that's simply out of necessity. But never stopped me starting a new game and not advancing to far into the story so I could play as Arthur. No homo. John was super cool his development was great and if anything i enjoyed the way that Arthur and Johns relationship grew and sides formed (depending on how you played). I feel like alot of people who make the complaint that John sucks in this game haven't played through the epilogue. You were too attached of Arthur to play with John then. One of my favourite lines thus far was when the photographer asks if he's had any run ins with wolves and Arthur just replies 'sure' in a way that's so... lackadaisical. When Arthur died in rdr2 I'm pretty sure everyone was upset including me, I was so upset that it was my first time actually crying from a video game characters death and when people got to chance to play as John we were all like "NO BRING ARTHUR BACK PLS ROCKSTAR!!!! I loved the development. Arthur does bad things, but he justifies it by saying it's for the good of the gang. In stealing from the rich, they in turn gave to the poor. John has a more unique personality in my opinion though. It was kinda bad in my opinion. John Marston Vs Arthur Morgan Fist Fight | NPC vs NPC Funny Modded RDR2! But yeah now i just found out i’m going to complete as much as i can now i guess, i wanted arthur to find all the dinobones etc and see him just complete it. Whereas I disagree with 90% of it. A subreddit for Rockstar's critically acclaimed open-world Western game Red Dead Redemption, its prequel Red Dead Redemption 2, and its online multiplayer Red Dead Online. 99% Upvoted. I just prefer Arthur because he’s much more realistic. John had a lot more depth to him imo. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the reddeadredemption community. I was not a fan of them killing Arthur. With two games full of information let's look at 5 things wrong with John Marston's story and 5 reasons he's one of the best characters in the franchise. It made me love him even more as he's extremely relatable knowing that he struggled emotionally as a man and a father. ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. This shit just sound crazy but yeah that’s my thoughts on this right now. Would love to go into more detail about this once more people have finished the game. He’s a pretty big asshole, and I love that. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the reddeadredemption community. I have a 100% story 87% total save with John. His father was an illiterate Scottish immigrant who was born on the boat to New York, while his mother was a prostitute, who died during John's birth. Young Arthur was not a stranger to the life of crime, as his father, Lyle Morgan, was a well-respected outlaw before he was arrested for burglary in 1874. The end of the game is when he finally stops doubting himself. No lasso. And as complex as he is - he's simple. He went from collecting debts by force to absolving debts and handing out money instead. The … Sort by. I'm going to use that one when I want to rob people and just cause mayehem. Archived. He writes in his journal that his actions are revolting to him at times. Close. to me arthur came across as actually being pretty well educated by (presumably) Hosea. He ran with Dutch van der Linde, Bill Williamson, Arthur Morganand Javier Escuella, committing robberies, raids, murders, kidnappings, and other crimes across the frontier. D&D Beyond By Joshua Duckworth Dec 29, 2019. قولنا مين فيهم الأقرب لقلبك؟ #GameValley #LetsPlay The Red Dead Redemption franchise has two great protagonists in John Marston and Arthur Morgan, but here's how the former is better than the latter. Arthur is the protagonist of Red Dead Redemption 2, and as a result he has relationships with important characters, as well as numerous other minor characters in the story.He also gains new relationships throughout his journey. Arthur Morgan vs John Marston,who is a better protagonist? Accompanied by Javier Escuella, Arthur finds John close to death and sporting a few new scars. First of all I just want to say that John has been my favourite video game character since 2010, he has incredible depth and a very likeable personality. And that's my opinion. John Marston learned from Arthur and the rest of the Van der Linde gang, and he goes on to surpass Arthur Morgan. I love John, but Arthur is making a great impression with me, will have to come back when this is over. I just liked seeing it as Arthur and not through Johns eyes. So the young John is a lot more 'annoying' but he isn't always like that as he gets much older. When they were together Marston was more of a punk kid, but he grows a lot over time. There are signs that he's not doing well long before the game actually says he's sick. To anyone saying that they are upset because Arthur is dead. As to which story is sadder, it's tough to say. He also saves Abigail and Jack. I wouldn't go as far as to say John Marston was terrible all the way through. Virgin Arthur Morgan vs chad John Marston. See more ideas about red dead redemption, red dead redemption ii, redemption. To anyone saying that Arthur saved John's life... Nope. All in all the game was amazing. I think that the circumstances of the first Red Dead enabled John to come off with more depth (his family being captured and his forced yet reluctant Search for his ex gang).